Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Chickasaw
956
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
332nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Caribbean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,693,306 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 33.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $53,732, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $82,193, a difference of 0.39%), median earnings ($41,119 compared to $40,672, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,254 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,319 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $71,860 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,119 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,193 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,414 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,757 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,326 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,513 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $48,535 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 56.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 54.4%), and receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.0%), male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 16.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.9%), currently married (41.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 149.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 67.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 52.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 80.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 44.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 71.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 72.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Caribbean | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |