Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from England

Chickasaw

Good
Fair
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,595,920 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 83.3 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from England Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $36,475, a difference of 33.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $82,193, a difference of 33.2%), and median household income ($92,098 compared to $70,005, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.9%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,844
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,038
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,098
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,722
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,527
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,277
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,817
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,020
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,446
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,715
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.5%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.1%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.7%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.1%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.7%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 58.0%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.6%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.4%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.3%).
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EnglandChickasaw
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%