Celtic vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Chickasaw
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,455,640 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 12.8 Chickasaw.
Celtic vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $82,193, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $36,475, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $70,005, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $40,672, a difference of 12.4%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.9%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.6%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Celtic vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |