Chilean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Chickasaw
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,104,015 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 125.5 Chickasaw.
Chilean vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $82,193, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $70,005, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $77,929, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $34,414, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $44,763, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.1%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 36.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.2%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chilean vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.4%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |