Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
9,269
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
25th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from South Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,898,202 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,465 compared to $36,475, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,886 compared to $82,193, a difference of 37.3%), and median household income ($95,800 compared to $70,005, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $34,414, a difference of 23.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,465 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,286 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,800 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,850 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,899 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,508 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,705 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,748 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,886 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,234 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 38.1%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.91%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 78.3%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |