Spanish vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Spanish
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Spanish
Chickasaw
4,224
SOCIAL INDEX
39.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
203rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Spanish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,255,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Spanish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.106% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish corresponds to an increase of 106.4 Chickasaw.
Spanish vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,554 compared to $82,193, a difference of 19.9%), median household income ($83,343 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,200 compared to $77,929, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($38,098 compared to $34,414, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($45,432 compared to $40,672, a difference of 11.7%).
Income Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,249 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $99,977 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,343 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,432 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,576 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,098 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,813 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,200 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,554 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,795 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.5%).
Poverty Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.3%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Spanish vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Disability Metric | Spanish | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |