Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Chickasaw
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,769,847 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Chickasaw.
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,732, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $40,672, a difference of 10.7%).
Income Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,017 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,910 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,919 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,027 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,306 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,461 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,158 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,058 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,149 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,021 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.43 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.2%), associate's degree (43.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.0%).
Disability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |