Immigrants from Russia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,503,439 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 17.6 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $36,475, a difference of 42.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $77,929, a difference of 39.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $82,193, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $53,732, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 45.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.38%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 33.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.75%), family households (63.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 92.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 79.7%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.9%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.21%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.1%).