Portuguese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Portuguese
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Portuguese
Chickasaw
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Portuguese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,292,731 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 30.3 Chickasaw.
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $82,193, a difference of 28.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $77,929, a difference of 27.6%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $70,005, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.73%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $34,414, a difference of 16.8%).
Income Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,362 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,286 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,976 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,032 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,663 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,177 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,436 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,429 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,309 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,440 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 37.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (47.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.4%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 13.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |