Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Chickasaw
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,118,859 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 23.2 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,046 compared to $70,005, a difference of 24.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,190 compared to $82,193, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($104,966 compared to $85,356, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.1%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $47,832, a difference of 16.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,187 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,966 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $87,046 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,925 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,615 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,704 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,611 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,322 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,190 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,843 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.21 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Nepal vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 66.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Nepal | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |