Malaysian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Chickasaw
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,936,431 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Chickasaw.
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,064 compared to $70,005, a difference of 15.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $82,193, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $47,832, a difference of 6.1%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $36,475, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($43,844 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.8%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.3%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 63.3%), bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and associate's degree (41.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.64%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Malaysian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.6%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |