Liberian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,752,358 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.243% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to an increase of 243.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.8%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $44,763, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,356 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($49,318 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $77,929, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.7%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.9%), bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (88.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.8%).