Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,092,416 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 53.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,249 compared to $82,193, a difference of 28.1%), median family income ($108,544 compared to $85,356, a difference of 27.2%), and per capita income ($46,008 compared to $36,475, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $44,763, a difference of 3.2%), and median female earnings ($39,952 compared to $34,414, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.6%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.61%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.5%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 77.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 76.6%), and master's degree (19.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.4%).