Cuban vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,252,751 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,619 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.13%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.44%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 54.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.4%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 60.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%).