Immigrants from Grenada vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,867,596 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.150% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 150.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 68.0%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $34,414, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $82,193, a difference of 4.1%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $85,356, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.0%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 54.4%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 51.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.3%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 376.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 171.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 144.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 105.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 144.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 62.6%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 104.2%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 84.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.8%).