British West Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

British West Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

British West Indians

Chickasaw

Tragic
Fair
938
SOCIAL INDEX
6.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
333rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in British West Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,274,119 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Chickasaw.
British West Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 50.8%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $34,414, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,636 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $82,193, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($88,987 compared to $85,356, a difference of 4.3%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,330
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,987
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,647
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,552
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,636
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,299
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,844
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,565
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,571
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,463
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
27.2%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
13.1%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.8%), male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
24.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.4%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
79.0%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.1%), married-couple households (38.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.2%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.3%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Tragic
36.3%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 278.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 115.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 31.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 66.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 94.0%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.5%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

British West Indian vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 84.2%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricBritish West IndianChickasaw
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.99%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.9%