Pueblo vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,533,075 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($41,314 compared to $47,832, a difference of 15.8%), and per capita income ($32,012 compared to $36,475, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $44,763, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 92.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 60.8%), and family poverty (17.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (28.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 47.9%), currently married (38.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), family households (68.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.80%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and hearing disability (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).