Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Nicaraguans
Chickasaw
3,542
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
217th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Nicaraguan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,302,153 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Chickasaw.
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($79,737 compared to $70,005, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.4%), median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $47,832, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $40,672, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,372 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,231 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $79,737 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,026 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,215 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,904 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,275 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $87,751 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $92,554 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,474 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Poverty Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.47%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.2%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.53%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 56.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.64%), college, 1 year or more (53.9% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Nicaraguan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
Disability Metric | Nicaraguan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 23.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |