Pakistani vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pakistanis
Chickasaw
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Pakistani Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,289,145 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.859% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 859.1 Chickasaw.
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,317 compared to $82,193, a difference of 28.1%), median household income ($89,638 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,401 compared to $77,929, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($40,596 compared to $34,414, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $47,832, a difference of 18.6%).
Income Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,587 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,390 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,638 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,254 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,719 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,596 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,325 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,401 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,317 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,844 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.5%).
Poverty Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.95%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 48.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.8%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.2%).
Disability Metric | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |