Guamanian/Chamorro vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,789,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.177% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 177.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,255 compared to $70,005, a difference of 23.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $82,193, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $77,929, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (66.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.0%), master's degree (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.7%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%).