Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Puerto Rican
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Puerto Ricans
Chickasaw
244
SOCIAL INDEX
0.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
347th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Puerto Rican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,522,759 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Chickasaw.
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 45.1%), householder income over 65 years ($42,550 compared to $53,732, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($70,423 compared to $85,356, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $34,414, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.7%), and median earnings ($35,560 compared to $40,672, a difference of 14.4%).
Income Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,268 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,423 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,197 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $35,560 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $40,071 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,560 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $39,726 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $65,996 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,234 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $42,550 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 118.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (21.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 100.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 99.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 29.8%).
Poverty Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 20.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 32.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 32.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 31.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 21.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (16.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 67.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.7%), and unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 5.4% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 58.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 25.8%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and currently married (39.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.39%), divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 45.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 97.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 89.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and vision disability (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 2.9% |