Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Chickasaw
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,854,146 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.822. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 156.5 Chickasaw.
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.9%), median household income ($83,968 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,987 compared to $77,929, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.6%), median earnings ($45,468 compared to $40,672, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.4%).
Income Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,516 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,092 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,968 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,468 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,409 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,513 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,914 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,987 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,417 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,922 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 182.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.7%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 2nd grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |