German Russian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
German Russian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
German Russians
Chickasaw
4,821
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
192nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in German Russian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,053,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.638% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 1,637.9 Chickasaw.
German Russian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,266 compared to $36,475, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($93,858 compared to $85,356, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $44,763, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $53,732, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($49,924 compared to $47,832, a difference of 4.4%).
Income Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,266 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,858 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,856 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,200 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,924 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,105 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,673 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,220 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $89,398 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,356 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Poor 9.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.65%).
Unemployment Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (45.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 60.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.1%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 59.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 45.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 35.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
German Russian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.0%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.3%).
Disability Metric | German Russian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |