Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Denmark
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Denmark

Chickasaw

Good
Fair
7,985
SOCIAL INDEX
77.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
95th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Denmark Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,303,140 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.153% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 152.8 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Denmark Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $36,475, a difference of 47.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,363 compared to $77,929, a difference of 41.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,000 compared to $82,193, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.5%), and median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $34,414, a difference of 26.8%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$53,799
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,445
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,510
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,186
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,625
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,646
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,612
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,363
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,000
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,801
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.2%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.3%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Excellent
20.5%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.82%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.2%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.6%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 91.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.6%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 71.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.3%).
Immigrants from Denmark vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from DenmarkChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%