Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bangladeshis
Chickasaw
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Bangladeshi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,787,904 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Chickasaw.
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $44,763, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($74,112 compared to $70,005, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,263 compared to $40,672, a difference of 1.5%), per capita income ($35,897 compared to $36,475, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,897 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,358 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,112 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,263 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,744 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,960 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,589 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,363 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,402 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,719 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 24.8%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.46%), female poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Poverty Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Average 64.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 109.0%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.68%), ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |