Immigrants from Israel vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,631,295 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $36,475, a difference of 57.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $77,929, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,893 compared to $82,193, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $53,732, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 46.3%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 44.3%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.86%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 98.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 133.7%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 101.9%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 98.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 87.0%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 81.5%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.5%).