Belizean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Belizean
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Belizeans
Chickasaw
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Belizean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,047,347 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 60.1 Chickasaw.
Belizean vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 27.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($77,028 compared to $70,005, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,358 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.6%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $40,672, a difference of 5.0%).
Income Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,097 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,880 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,028 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,702 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,358 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,429 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,094 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,534 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,684 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,580 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.36%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Poverty Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.4% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.3%), currently married (42.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.39 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 82.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Belizean vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Belizean | Chickasaw |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |