Icelander vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Icelander
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Icelanders
Chickasaw
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Icelander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,051,684 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to a decrease of 19.3 Chickasaw.
Icelander vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $82,193, a difference of 24.4%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $36,475, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $34,414, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.0%).
Income Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $44,987 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,282 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,797 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,916 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,415 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,109 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,247 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,560 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,261 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,270 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.8%).
Poverty Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (47.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Icelander vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.5%).
Disability Metric | Icelander | Chickasaw |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |