Osage vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Chickasaw
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,218,951 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 19.5 Chickasaw.
Osage vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $36,475, a difference of 8.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $77,929, a difference of 8.4%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $85,356, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $44,763, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $53,732, a difference of 3.6%).
Income Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.8%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.090%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.91%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.31%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.1%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Osage vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Osage | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |