Haitian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Haitian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Haitians

Chickasaw

Poor
Fair
1,345
SOCIAL INDEX
11.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
314th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Haitian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,827,170 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Haitian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Haitians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Haitians corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Chickasaw.
Haitian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Haitian vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 37.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,231 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($36,374 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,218 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.16%), median earnings ($40,918 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.60%), and per capita income ($37,289 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.2%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricHaitianChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,289
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,218
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,306
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,918
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,903
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,374
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,231
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,055
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,384
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,912
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.6%), receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricHaitianChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.8%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.5%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHaitianChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHaitianChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.8%
Tragic
79.0%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.2%), currently married (41.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.8%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHaitianChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.3%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
36.3%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 89.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 43.5%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHaitianChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.6%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 68.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricHaitianChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.5%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Haitian vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Haitian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Haitian vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricHaitianChickasaw
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%