Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,677,950 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 38.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $36,475, a difference of 48.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,930 compared to $82,193, a difference of 43.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($111,676 compared to $77,929, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,003 compared to $53,732, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 47.4%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.95%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 84.8%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 70.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.0%).