Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bahamas

Chickasaw

Tragic
Fair
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,084,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 44.7 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 29.0%), median male earnings ($45,176 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $44,763, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($84,732 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,177 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,193
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,732
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,349
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,861
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,176
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,027
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,793
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,910
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,177
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,174
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.7%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.090%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BahamasChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%