Mexican vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mexican
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mexicans
Chickasaw
1,179
SOCIAL INDEX
9.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
319th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Mexican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,477,974 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Chickasaw.
Mexican vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $44,763, a difference of 11.7%), median household income ($74,399 compared to $70,005, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,816 compared to $82,193, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,618 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.31%), and median earnings ($39,834 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,559 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,618 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,399 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,834 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,147 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,664 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,989 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,427 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,816 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,897 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.96%), male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.4% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households with children (31.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 31.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.48 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 94.5%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 35.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Mexican vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |