Immigrants from Japan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,560,160 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $36,475, a difference of 46.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,498 compared to $82,193, a difference of 44.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $77,929, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $53,732, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 58.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 50.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.8%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 37.4%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.33%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 89.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.5%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.6%).