Syrian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Syrian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Syrians
Chickasaw
7,975
SOCIAL INDEX
77.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
97th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Syrian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,828,060 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Syrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Syrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Syrians corresponds to an increase of 23.0 Chickasaw.
Syrian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,207 compared to $82,193, a difference of 30.4%), per capita income ($46,837 compared to $36,475, a difference of 28.4%), and median household income ($89,830 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,353 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,494 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.2%).
Income Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,837 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $109,299 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,830 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,934 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,187 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,727 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,353 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,215 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,207 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,494 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.22%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.4%).
Poverty Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.3%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.5%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Syrian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.0%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.4%).
Disability Metric | Syrian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |