Samoan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Samoan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Samoans
Chickasaw
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Samoan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,555,971 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Chickasaw.
Samoan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $82,193, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($86,498 compared to $70,005, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $40,672, a difference of 8.7%).
Income Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,826 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,344 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,498 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,206 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,389 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,498 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,610 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,385 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,580 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,427 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.0%), single father poverty (13.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.5%).
Poverty Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.4%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.5%), associate's degree (41.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Samoan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.0%).
Disability Metric | Samoan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |