French Canadian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,496,854 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.176% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 175.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $82,193, a difference of 20.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $77,929, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $85,356, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $53,732, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.3%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.62%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.4%).