Kiowa vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Kiowa
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Kiowa
Chickasaw
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Kiowa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,864,091 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 29.0 Chickasaw.
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $82,193, a difference of 9.9%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $70,005, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $44,763, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($39,232 compared to $40,672, a difference of 3.7%).
Income Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,102 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $80,885 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $65,914 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,232 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,094 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,074 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,733 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,776 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,815 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,140 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Poverty Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 51.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.9%), married-couple households (42.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 43.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.0%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and male disability (15.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |