Immigrants from Ghana vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,104,890 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 19.2 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($81,489 compared to $70,005, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $34,414, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $47,832, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.1%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $40,672, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.4%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 111.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.8%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 74.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.5%).