Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Chickasaw
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,584,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Chickasaw.
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $77,929, a difference of 53.3%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $70,005, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $82,193, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $44,763, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $53,732, a difference of 30.7%).
Income Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,874 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,312 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,262 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,253 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $66,078 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,481 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,239 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,496 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,343 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,238 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 62.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 52.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.1%).
Poverty Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.4%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 43.6%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 94.0%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 92.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.21%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 82.0%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%).
Disability Metric | Indian (Asian) | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |