Armenian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Armenian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Armenians
Chickasaw
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Armenian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,424,142 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Chickasaw.
Armenian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,248 compared to $77,929, a difference of 32.5%), per capita income ($48,287 compared to $36,475, a difference of 32.4%), and median household income ($91,807 compared to $70,005, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,656 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,179 compared to $44,763, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,287 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $109,692 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,807 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,804 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,134 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,212 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,179 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,248 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,002 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,656 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (18.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 43.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.6%).
Poverty Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 64.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 38.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Average 64.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 58.9%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
Education Level Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Armenian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 68.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 62.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.1%).
Disability Metric | Armenian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.9% |