Slovak vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slovak
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slovaks
Chickasaw
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Slovak Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,457,611 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.841. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 97.1 Chickasaw.
Slovak vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,029 compared to $82,193, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,032 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($103,729 compared to $85,356, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $44,763, a difference of 11.2%).
Income Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,229 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,729 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,798 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,095 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,306 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $39,029 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,753 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,032 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $101,029 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,039 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.9%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.2%).
Poverty Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.6%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Slovak vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Slovak | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |