Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Central American Indians
Chickasaw
506
SOCIAL INDEX
2.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
344th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Central American Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,268,130 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.640% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 640.4 Chickasaw.
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $44,763, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($74,847 compared to $70,005, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.84%), householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.94%), and median earnings ($41,474 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.0%).
Income Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,699 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,034 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,847 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,474 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,433 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,930 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,643 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,355 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,764 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,232 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.26%), single female poverty (25.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and single male poverty (17.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.4% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.1%), currently married (43.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.35 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.9%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.40%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 89.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |