Maltese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Maltese
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Maltese
Chickasaw
9,141
SOCIAL INDEX
88.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
30th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Maltese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,696,102 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 49.7 Chickasaw.
Maltese vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $77,929, a difference of 41.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $82,193, a difference of 39.6%), and median household income ($97,015 compared to $70,005, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $53,732, a difference of 22.9%).
Income Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,640 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,862 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,015 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,526 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,953 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,357 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,735 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,064 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,754 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,027 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 52.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 23.7%).
Poverty Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.99%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 49.8%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Maltese vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.7%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.2%).
Disability Metric | Maltese | Chickasaw |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |