Egyptian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Egyptians

Chickasaw

Excellent
Fair
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Egyptian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,929,997 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 37.9 Chickasaw.
Egyptian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,673 compared to $70,005, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,256 compared to $82,193, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,282 compared to $77,929, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $53,732, a difference of 21.8%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricEgyptianChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,358
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,119
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,673
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,701
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,095
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,305
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,444
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,282
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,256
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,441
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Tragic
27.2%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 46.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricEgyptianChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEgyptianChickasaw
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEgyptianChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
79.0%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 28.5%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEgyptianChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
36.3%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.0%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEgyptianChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 54.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricEgyptianChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.1%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Egyptian vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.4%).
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricEgyptianChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%