Somali vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Somali
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Somalis
Chickasaw
3,155
SOCIAL INDEX
29.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
231st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Somali Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,560,589 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Somali communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Somalis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Somalis corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Chickasaw.
Somali vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 28.0%), median female earnings ($38,333 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.4%), and per capita income ($40,367 compared to $36,475, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,004 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.51%), median male earnings ($49,025 compared to $47,832, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($43,567 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.1%).
Income Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,367 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,085 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,782 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,567 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,025 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,333 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,657 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,752 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,600 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,004 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.5%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.4% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.1%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 57.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.0%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.3%), bachelor's degree (38.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 11th grade (92.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 59.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 46.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Somali vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Somali and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.3%).
Disability Metric | Somali | Chickasaw |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |