Immigrants from Moldova vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,329,511 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 12.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,446 compared to $70,005, a difference of 30.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $82,193, a difference of 30.6%), and per capita income ($47,489 compared to $36,475, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $53,732, a difference of 17.1%), and median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $34,414, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 50.5%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 46.2%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 33.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.35%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.0%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.7%).