Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,566,967 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.262% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 261.6 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $36,475, a difference of 29.9%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $70,005, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $44,763, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 37.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.94%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.89%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |