Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
3,479
SOCIAL INDEX
32.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
219th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,541,347 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,289 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $82,193, a difference of 18.4%), and per capita income ($42,950 compared to $36,475, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $47,832, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,950 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,256 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,289 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,564 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,457 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,257 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,609 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,372 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,284 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,837 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.84%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 59.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 26.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.9%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.6%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 46.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |