Immigrants from Asia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,362,505 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $70,005, a difference of 42.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $77,929, a difference of 42.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $82,193, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $53,732, a difference of 25.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $44,763, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 51.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 46.7%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.95%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 35.5%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.8%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 69.9%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%).